Skip to main content

page search

Library Measuring Agricultural Knowledge and Adoption

Measuring Agricultural Knowledge and Adoption

Measuring Agricultural Knowledge and Adoption

Resource information

Date of publication
November 2014
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
oai:openknowledge.worldbank.org:10986/20506

Understanding the trade-offs in
improving the precision of agricultural measures through
survey design is crucial. Yet, standard indicators used to
determine program effectiveness may be flawed and at a
differential rate for men and women. The authors use a
household survey from Mozambique to estimate the measurement
error from male and female self-reports of their adoption
and knowledge of three practices: intercropping, mulching,
and strip tillage. Despite clear differences in human and
physical capital, there are no obvious differences in the
knowledge, adoption, and error in self-reporting between men
and women. Having received training unanimously lowers
knowledge misreports and increases adoption misreports.
Other determinants of reporting error differ by gender.
Misreporting is positively associated with a greater number
of plots for men. Recall decay on measures of knowledge
appears prominent among men but not women. Findings from
regression and cost-effectiveness analyses always favor the
collection of objective measures of knowledge. Given the
lowest rate of accuracy for adoption was around 80 percent,
costlier objective adoption measures are recommended for a
subsample in regions with heterogeneous farm sizes.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Kondylis, Florence
Mueller, Valerie
Zhu, Siyao Jessica

Publisher(s)
Data Provider