Skip to main content

page search

Library Mainstreaming ecosystem science in spatial planning practice: Exploiting a hybrid opportunity space

Mainstreaming ecosystem science in spatial planning practice: Exploiting a hybrid opportunity space

Mainstreaming ecosystem science in spatial planning practice: Exploiting a hybrid opportunity space
Land Use Policy Volume 70

Resource information

Date of publication
December 2017
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
lupj:S0264837716306421
Pages
16
License of the resource

This paper develops a framework for improved mainstreaming of ecosystem science in policy and decision-making within a spatial planning context. Ecosystem science is advanced as a collective umbrella to capture a body of work and approaches rooted in social-ecological systems thinking, spawning a distinctive ecosystem terminology: ecosystem approach, ecosystem services, ecosystem services framework and natural capital. The interface between spatial planning and ecosystem science is explored as a theoretical opportunity space to improve mainstreaming processes adapting Rogers’ (2003) diffusion model. We introduce the twin concepts of hooks (linking ecosystem science to a key policy or legislative term, duty or priority that relate to a particular user group) and ‘bridges’ (linking ecosystem science to a term, concept or policy priority that is used and readily understood across multiple groups and publics) as translational mechanisms in transdisciplinary mainstreaming settings. We argue that ecosystem science can be embedded into the existing work priorities and vocabularies of spatial planning practice using these hooks and bridges. The resultant framework for mainstreaming is then tested, drawing on research funded as part of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-On programme (2012–2014), within 4 case studies; each reflecting different capacities, capabilities, opportunities and barriers. The results reveal the importance of leadership, political buy in, willingness to experiment outside established comfort zones and social learning as core drivers supporting mainstreaming processes. Whilst there are still significant challenges in mainstreaming in spatial planning settings, the identification and use of hooks and bridges collectively, enables traction to be gained for further advances; moving beyond the status quo to generate additionality and potential behaviour change within different modes of mainstreaming practice. This pragmatic approach has global application to help improve the way nature is respected and taken account of in planning systems nationally and globally.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Scott, Alister
Carter, Claudia
Hardman, Michael
Grayson, Nick
Slaney, Tim

Publisher(s)
Data Provider
Geographical focus