Skip to main content

page search

Library Comments on papers 29b (De Leeuw and Tothill 1990) and 28b (Scoones 1989)

Comments on papers 29b (De Leeuw and Tothill 1990) and 28b (Scoones 1989)

Comments on papers 29b (De Leeuw and Tothill 1990) and 28b (Scoones 1989)

Resource information

Date of publication
December 1989
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
eldis:A25582

In their recent paper, de Leeuw and Tothill (1990) discussed the shortcomings of estimating carrying capacity (CC) of pastoral systems in Africa. They noted the difficulty of determining available forage per animal due to high annual and spatial variability in plant production, seasonal changes in forage quantity and quality, livestock species mix, and the use of supplemental feeds. Nevertheless, they concluded that the concept `is useful for planning purposes' and that `the underlying principles on which it is based need full acceptance' if sustained resource management is to be accomplished. While agreeing with their review of problems associated with the concept, the article takes exception to their conclusions. The article's authors presents their arguments by addressing the following three questions:is the concept of CC sound?can CC be adequately estimated?can CC information, even if we could obtain it, be meaningfully applied in pastoral production systems? Finally, the article offers an alternative approach for conserving rangeland resources in pastoral systems.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

G. B. Bartels
G. K. Perrier
B. E. Norton
M. Drinkwater

Data Provider
Geographical focus