Skip to main content

page search

Library Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning

Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning

Predictive spatial niche and biodiversity hotspot models for small mammal communities in Alaska: applying machine-learning to conservation planning

Resource information

Date of publication
December 2015
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
AGRIS:US201500161902
Pages
681-697

CONTEXT: Changing global environmental conditions, especially at northern latitudes, are threatening to shift species distributions and alter wildlife communities. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to establish current distributions and community arrangements of small mammals to provide important baselines for monitoring and conserving biodiversity into the future. METHODS: We used 4,408 archived museum and open-access records and the machine learning algorithm, RandomForests, to create high-resolution spatial niche models for 17 species of rodents and shrews in Alaska. Models were validated using independent trapping results from 20 locations stratified along statewide mega-transects, and an average species richness curve was calculated for field samples. Community cluster analyses (varclus) identified geographic patterns of sympatry among species. Species models were summed to create the first small-mammal species richness map for Alaska. RESULTS: Species richness increased logarithmically to a mean of 3.3 species per location over 1,500 trap-nights. Distribution models yielded mean accuracies of 71 % (45–90 %), and maps correctly predicted a mean of 75 % (60–95 %) of occurrences correctly in the field. Top predictors included Soil Type, Ecoregion, Landfire Land-cover, December Sea Ice, and July Temperature at the geographic scale. Cluster analysis delineated five community groups (3–4 species/group), and species richness was highest (11–13 species) over the Yukon-Tanana Uplands. CONCLUSIONS: Models presented here provide spatial predictions of current small mammal biodiversity in Alaska and an initial framework for mapping and monitoring wildlife distributions across broad landscapes into the future.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

Baltensperger, Andrew P.
Huettmann, Falk

Publisher(s)
Data Provider