Skip to main content

page search

Library Landscape metrics as a tool for evaluating scenarios for flood prevention and nature conservation

Landscape metrics as a tool for evaluating scenarios for flood prevention and nature conservation

Landscape metrics as a tool for evaluating scenarios for flood prevention and nature conservation

Resource information

Date of publication
May 2011
Resource Language
ISBN / Resource ID
DOAJ:2f67798bda3c4e008e5245f792b98246
Pages
10
License of the resource

Within the framework of the project „Flood Prevention and Nature Conservation in the Weisseritz area“ („HochNatur“),
a method including landscape metrics was developed and applied to assess and to compare different land
use scenarios with regard to flood prevention and nature conservation. For the analysis, two sub-catchments strongly
differing in land use within the Weisseritz catchment (Eastern Erzgebirge, Saxony, Germany) were selected. The
first step of the evaluation procedure was a biotope assessment using three assessment criteria (naturalness, substitutability,
rareness / endangerment). However, the biotope assessment did not yield any information about spatial
distribution or the structural composition of the landscape. Therefore, landscape metrics were applied to analyse the
structural and biotope type diversity at the landscape scale. Different landscape metrics (Shannon/Weaver diversity
index, mean patch size index, Interdispersion/Juxtaposition index) and a weighting system were used to compare the
different land use scenarios and the current state. The analysed catchment areas differ substantially in terms of their
current state and potential measures regarding flood prevention and nature conservation depending on the location
and distribution of biotope types. It was demonstrated that this method can be used for small catchment areas regardless
of their land use for assessing, analysing and comparing different land use scenarios for a specific area.

Share on RLBI navigator
NO

Authors and Publishers

Author(s), editor(s), contributor(s)

S. Bianchin
E. Richert
M. Merta
Ch. Seidler

Geographical focus