Le 15 décembre 2022, l'équipe de gestion des connaissances de LAND-at-scale a organisé un webinaire intitulé La sécurité foncière revisitée : Savons-nous ce que nous devons savoir ? Le webinaire a présenté les résultats préliminaires d'une étude sur la sécurité de tenure, rédigée par Guus van Westen, et Jaap Zevenbergen. La présentation de l'étude a été suivie de séances en petits groupes sur la sécurité de tenure et sa relation avec les droits fonciers des femmes, le rôle de l'État, les conflits fonciers et le développement économique, animées par des experts fonciers et des panélistes qui ont rendu compte des discussions en plénière avec leurs réflexions respectives sur les résultats de l'étude.
The 13th Annual LANDac Annual Conference is taking place in person next week in Utrecht, Netherlands, for the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic began. All the conference sessions will also be accessible online to registered participants. LANDac brings together land governance stakeholders from around the world who might not otherwise meet, including academic researchers, the private, civil society, and policy makers.
Les femmes possèdent moins de 20 % des terres dans le monde.
La moitié des petits exploitants agricoles dans le monde sont des femmes.
70 % de la nourriture de l'Afrique est produite par des petites exploitations agricoles féminines.
A administração fundiária é uma ferramenta poderosa para o desenvolvimento equitativo, mas sua forma e o modo como é implementada são cruciais para a realização desse potencial. Este webinário irá explorar como uma abordagem holística e centrada nas pessoas pode revolucionar a Administração Fundiária Adequada ao seu Propósito (FFPLA - sigla em inglês) e garantir que a administração da terra realmente atenda às necessidades das comunidades. Ao priorizar as vozes da população local, especialmente de mulheres, jovens e grupos marginalizados, podemos criar sistemas de administração de terras que não sejam apenas eficientes, mas também justos e inclusivos.
Over the past two decades, policymakers have expressed considerable optimism about the capacity of international development to curb transnational migration, yet there is a dearth of research examining how and under what conditions development interventions impact migration decisions. Enlisting a case study approach in the Maya-K’iche’ community of Almolonga, this article examines divergent meanings and practices of “development” and its impact on the migratory aspirations and outcomes of Indigenous families in Guatemala.
Traditionally, in the context of environment and natural resources management, many communication efforts have focused on the dissemination of technical information to end-users who were expected to adopt them. Development practitioners were trying to ‘push’ their products on communities in order to receive community commitment to their development initiatives.
