Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Community Organizations Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy
Journal

Location

Netherlands
Working languages
inglês
Affiliated Organization
Publishing Company

Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solut

Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information from the diverse range of disciplines and interest groups which must be combined to formulate effective land use policies. The journal examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.


Land Use Policy aims to provide policy guidance to governments and planners and it is also a valuable teaching resource.


ISSN: 0264-8377


 

Members:

Resources

Displaying 171 - 175 of 279

Typology and distribution of small farms in Europe: Towards a better picture

Peer-reviewed publication
Maio, 2018
Europa

The contribution of small farms to local food supply, food security and food sovereignty is widely acknowledged at a global level. In the particular case of Europe, they often are seen as an alternative to large and specialised farms. Assessing the real role of small farms has been limited by a lack of information, as small farms are frequently omitted from agricultural censuses and national statistics.

Critical factors for crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: A cross-analysis of worldwide case studies

Peer-reviewed publication
Março, 2018
Reino Unido
Estados Unidos
Ásia
Europa

Despite their recognized agricultural sustainability benefits, mixed crop-livestock farms have declined in the Northern hemisphere. As such, crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level is a promising alternative to this trend, but the knowledge of critical factors and strategies towards its successful implementation is still lacking. We developed an analytical framework to assess the critical determinants of the emergence and outcomes of integration, which helped us understand farmers’ collective strategies for reducing integration transaction costs.

Stimulating the social and environmental benefits of agriculture and forestry: An EU-based comparative analysis

Peer-reviewed publication
Março, 2018
Europa

Stimulating an effective provision of public goods and ecosystem services from Europe’s farmland and forests is a critical challenge for policy-makers. In this paper we focus on three aspects of this challenge. Firstly, we explore the different drivers that influence the provision of public goods and ecosystem services by farming and forestry. Secondly, we identify the key motivational, institutional and socio-economic factors that can encourage the provision of these benefits.

Linking notions of justice and project outcomes in carbon offset forestry projects: Insights from a comparative study in Uganda

Peer-reviewed publication
Março, 2018
Uganda

Over the last 20 years, Uganda has emerged as a testing ground for the various modes of carbon forestry used in Africa. Carbon forestry initiatives in Uganda raise questions of justice, given that people with comparatively negligible carbon footprints are affected by land use changes initiated by the desire of wealthy people, firms, and countries to reduce their more extensive carbon footprints.

Land ownership and technology adoption revisited: Improved maize varieties in Ethiopia

Peer-reviewed publication
Fevereiro, 2018
Etiópia

The lack of land ownership can discourage agricultural technology adoption, yet there is scarce evidence of the impact of land rental contracts on the adoption of improved crop varieties in developing countries. The current study investigates such impact using a nationally representative survey of Ethiopian maize farmers. In contrast to many previous studies, we show in a simple model that cash-renters are as likely to adopt improved maize varieties as owner-operators, while sharecroppers are more likely to adopt given that such varieties are profitable.