Resource information
Son preference is known to be found in
certain types of cultures, that is patrilineal cultures. But
what explains the fact that China, South Korea, and
Northwest India manifest such extreme child sex ratios
compared with other patrilineal societies? This paper argues
that what makes these societies unique is that their
pre-modern political and administrative systems used
patrilineages to organize and administer their citizens. The
interplay of culture, state, and political processes
generated uniquely rigid patriliny and son preference. The
paper also argues that the advent of the modern state in
these settings has unraveled the underpinnings of the rigid
patrilineal rules, and unleashed a variety of forces that
reduce son preference. Firstly, the modern state has
powerful tools for incorporating and managing its citizenry,
rendering patrilineages a threat rather than an asset for
the state. Secondly, the modern state has brought in
political, social, and legal reforms aimed to challenge
traditional social hierarchies, including the age and gender
hierarchies of the kinship system. Thirdly,
industrialization and urbanization have ushered in new modes
of social organization, which reduce the hold of clans and
lineages. Studies of the impact of the media suggest that
states can accelerate the resultant decline in son
preference, through media efforts to help parents perceive
that daughters can now be as valuable as sons.
