Pasar al contenido principal

page search

IssuesPropiedad colectivaLandLibrary Resource
Displaying 25 - 36 of 63

Propiedad colectiva de la tierra en Sudamérica, desafíos y perspectivas

Reports & Research
Enero, 2017
América del Sur

Entre el 23 de octubre y el 02 de diciembre de 2016, el IPDRS y el Land Portal, llevaron adelante un foro debate en línea sobre la Propiedad colectiva de la tierra en Sudamérica, desafíos y perspectivas, buscando alimentar la discusión que actualmente proviene de toda una dinámica global desde ONG, centros de investigación, activistas, universidades, colectivos y claramente organizaciones campesinas e indígenas que plantea todo un esfuerzo mundial para defender la propiedad colectiva de la tierra desde sus distintas dimensiones ante las presiones y amenazas provenientes del agronegocio y de

Accumulation by Land Dispossession and Labour Devaluation in Tanzania

Reports & Research
Noviembre, 2010
Tanzania

New commercial pressures on land and its impact on small producers is one of the major issues being discussed in both national and international arenas. As foreign states and corporate entities continue to exert pressures on African countries to acquire land for various investment purposes, Tanzania is not exempted. The country is stereotypically perceived as having large underutilized, or rather unexploited, fertile land – the so-called ‗virgin land‘.

Energy and Food Demands, Drivers of Land Grab; A Case of Rufiji River Basin in Tanzania

Conference Papers & Reports
Septiembre, 2012
Tanzania

Contemporary waves of large scale land acquisitions for commercial production in developing countries in Africa and other parts of the world have been branded as ‘land grabs’ by many scholars, media and activists. Some scholars have describe this phenomena as the “new scramble for Africa” (Moyo and Yeros, 2011). However, others have refuted such a description on the grounds that the current land deals are being negotiated by sovereign African states in the exercise of powers that they have under national laws (Odhiambo, 2011).

The Report of the National Land Forum 2005

Reports & Research
Abril, 2005
Tanzania

The Land Rights Research and Resources Institute held its second National level Public Forum on land on 12-13 May 2005. The two day forum was partly one of the planned activities in the Institute’s three year Strategic plan and a special event to commemorate the Institute’s tenth Anniversary. It thus took place along with other activities such as Training of Trainers (TOT) workshop, preparation and running of a documentary on land rights advocacy, special media programmes, Special theatre performance by Dhahabu theatre arts Group and moving into a more specious office premise.

Réforme Agraire: Colonisation et coopératives agricoles 2002/2

Journal Articles & Books
Noviembre, 2002
Suiza
Guatemala
Guinea-Bissau
Bolivia
Guinea
Costa Rica
Níger
Mozambique
Filipinas
Sudáfrica
Nicaragua
Italia
Ecuador
Noruega
Sudán
México
Brasil
Asia
África
Américas

The management of conflict over land and natural resources is a very broad issue and there is a growing literature on techniques that have potential for use in this field. At the moment, the Land Tenure Service of FAO’s Rural Development Division is working towards achieving a deeper understanding of the current methods and practices in land conflict management and is gathering cases from all over the world to ascertain the techniques used and the results achieved. This edition of Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives, prepared with the strong support of Ms A.

Réforme agraire: colonisation et coopératives agricoles 1998/1

Journal Articles & Books
Noviembre, 1998
Serbia
Francia
Macedonia del Norte
Bangladesh
Honduras
Estados Unidos de América
El Salvador
Chile
Guatemala
Colombia
Kenya
Marruecos
Japón
Uganda
Albania
Italia
Tanzania
Ecuador
Túnez
Senegal
Sudán
Paraguay
México
Brasil
Américas

This issue of Land Reform, Land Settlement and Cooperatives includes interesting descriptions of land tenure and related policies in Uganda, Tunisia, the United Republic of Tanzania and Morocco. Two thought-provoking articles on access to land and other assets focus on policies to reduce poverty and the function of markets in the allocation of production resources. In the first, J. Melmed-Sanjak and S.

Understanding forest tenure: What rights and for whom?

Journal Articles & Books
Noviembre, 2006
Estados Unidos de América
China
Indonesia
Reino Unido
Pakistán
Tailandia
Nepal
República de Corea
Filipinas
Malasia
Japón
Myanmar
Brunei Darussalam
Países Bajos
India
Bhután
Viet Nam
Camboya

The study conducted by FAO and partners in South and Southeast Asia was based on an analysis of forest tenure according to two variables: the type of ownership, and the level of control of and access to resources. It aimed to take into account the complex combination of forest ownership − whether legally or customarily defined − and arrangements for the management and use of forest resources. Forest tenure determines who can use what resources, for how long and under what conditions.

Securing land inheritance and land rights for women in Kenya

Journal Articles & Books
Febrero, 2017
Kenya

Women face many problems with regard to land inheritance and land rights in Kenya. Individual and community land ownership do not favour women. The reason for this is that ownership of land is patrilineal, which means that fathers share land amongst sons, while excluding daughters. This practice is traditionally widespread and partly accepted although it goes against the interest of women and is prohibited by the constitution.

Different approaches to the social vision of communal land management: the case of Galicia (Spain)

Journal Articles & Books
Septiembre, 2010
España

Communal forests, or Montes Veciñais en Man Común (MVMC), are a specific form of communal land tenure and a singular legal category in Galicia. The growing demographic decline in rural areas and, particularly, in inner areas of Galicia has led to a decrease in the economic interest of forest resources. The complexity of the different management modes or levels of organization of forest communities cannot be explained through a homogeneous interpretation.