Перейти к основному содержанию

page search

Community Organizations Other organizations (Projects Database)
Other organizations (Projects Database)
Other organizations (Projects Database)

Location

Working languages
English

Other organizations funding or implementing with land governance projects which are included in Land Portal's Projects Database. A detailed list of these organizations will be provided here soon. They range from bilateral or multilateral donor agencies, national or international NGOs,  research organizations etc.

Members:

Resources

Displaying 906 - 910 of 2117

Project Xeel: Defending Communal Land of the Maya Q'eqchi' in Petn

General

ACDIP will register 25 indigenous communities in their respective municipalities which will allow the communities to organize officially and govern themselves according to their ancestral traditions. They will also engage local governments and governmental agencies to form alliances with the goal of ensuring that these communities can gain access to sustainability use natural resources. ACDIP will further support these efforts by creating materials in Spanish and Q'eqchi' to educate community members, international donors and government officials on the effects various economic activities are having on water sources and land access.

Lobbying et Plaidoyer pour la sécurisation foncière des petits producteurs

General

La Fédération des organisations des producteurs agricoles du Congo au Sud-Kivu « FOPAC SUD-KIVU » est une organisation provinciale créée le 14 février 2006 pour une durée indéterminée. Son siège social est établi à Bukavu, avenue Mbaki au N°19A, dans la commune d’Ibanda. C’est une organisation Paysanne fédérative de 4ème niveau enregistrée au ministère de la justice sous le N° F.92/10848. La FOPAC SK a comme vision : « valoriser les paysans producteurs agricoles et améliorer les conditions de tous les paysans en milieu rural et en particulier celles de la femme ». Sa mission est : « promouvoir les paysans producteurs agricoles par la mise en relation, la représentation, les lobbyings, les plaidoyers, les échanges et les rapprochements de façon à contribuer à la réalisation de toute action de développement sur demande de ses membres et à travers ses membres. Son objet social est : - La constitution d’un cadre de concertation et de renforcement des capacités des OPA membres ; - La protection des OPA membres - La mise en place des stratégies de sécurité foncière et celle de l’agriculture durable ; - La facilitation du développement économique de ses membres Le Plan d’action 2012 a surtout une attention spécifique sur: Influencer les décisions prises à tous les niveaux en faveur des producteurs agricoles membres des OP avec comme activités: 1. Vulgariser la loi portant principes fondamentaux de l’agriculture (code agricole) 2. Faire un état de lieu sur la problématique foncière (dans 3 territoires) 3. Sensibiliser les membres des OP sur l’acquisition des titres fonciers 4. Organiser 2 tables rondes entre : Agriculteurs, éleveurs, autorités sur l’agriculture (espaces protégés, résolutions de conflits entre éleveurs et agriculteurs, protection des boisements, réaffectation du sol impropres à la culture) 5. Faire le monitoring pour identifier les taxes et barrières illégales à travers 5 territoires (Walungu, Kabare, Kalehe, Uvira, Fizi), 6. Faire un atelier d’actualisation et de validation du document sur les taxes et barrières illégales devant nous servir pour plaidoyer envers les autorités tant locales, provinciales que nationales est produit, Objectif global Le Plan d’action 2012 attend contribuer à atteindre l’objectif global suivant : Contribuer à l’amélioration des conditions de vie des paysans producteurs agricoles en valorisants leur statut dans les fonctions économiques Objectifs spécifiques - Renforcer la capacité organisationnelle et opérationnelle de la FOPAC SK - Influencer les décisions prises à tous les niveaux tant local, provincial et national en faveur des producteurs agricoles membres des OP - Renforcer la visibilité de la FOPAC SK Les activités opérationnelles OS N°1 : Renforcer la capacité organisationnelle et opérationnelle de la FOPAC SK Résultats 1 : La capacité organisationnelle et opérationnelle de la FOPAC SK est renforcée, le nombre des OP membres double passant du 10 au 20 Activités 1. Continuer l’identification des nouvelles OP qui seront membres de la FOPAC SK 2. Former les dirigeants des nouvelles OP identifiées sur les aspects organisationnels et structurels 3. Renforcer la capacité organisationnelle des nouvelles OPA OS N°2 : Influencer les décisions prises à tous les niveaux en faveur des producteurs agricoles membres des OP Résultat 2 : La FOPAC SK influence les décisions à tous les niveaux en faveur des producteurs agricoles membres des OPA Activités : 1. Vulgariser la loi portant principes fondamentaux de l’agriculture (code agricole) 2. Faire un état de lieu sur la problématique foncière (dans 3 territoires) 3. Sensibiliser les membres des OP sur l’acquisition des titres fonciers 4. Organiser 2 tables rondes entre : Agriculteurs, éleveurs, autorités sur l’agriculture (espaces protégés, résolutions de conflits entre éleveurs et agriculteurs, protection des boisements, réaffectation du sol impropres à la culture) 5. Faire le monitoring pour identifier les taxes et barrières illégales à travers 5 territoires (Walungu, Kabare, Kalehe, Uvira, Fizi), 6. Faire un atelier d’actualisation et de validation du document sur les taxes et barrières illégales devant nous servir pour plaidoyer envers les autorités tant locales, provinciales que nationales est produit, OS N°3 : Renforcer la visibilité de la FOPAC SK Résultat 3 : La FOPAC SK renforce la visibilité au niveau de la province 1. Produire et diffuser des émissions radio télévisées 2. Participer aux journées internationales affectées à l’agriculture (15/10 etc…..) 3. Produire les objets de visibilités (T-shirts, Képi, gilets et autres) 2.4. Les résultats attendus A la fin de l’année 2012, les résultats suivants sont attendus : 1. La capacité organisationnelle et opérationnelle de la FOPAC SK est renforcée Le nombre des OP membres double passant du 10 au 20 75% des nouvelles OP améliorent leurs capacités administratives, financières et leur niveau organisationnel.  60 dirigeants de nouvelles OP suivent une formation sur l’organisation structurelle 2. La FOPAC SK mène un plaidoyer en faveur des producteurs agricoles membres des OPA  La loi portant principes fondamentaux de l’agriculture (code agricole) est vulgarisée  Un état de lieu sur la problématique foncière est fait  Les membres des OP sont sensibilisés sur l’acquisition des titres fonciers  Deux tables rondes entre agriculteurs éleveurs et autorités sur l’agriculture est organisées  Le monitoring pour identifier les taxes et barrière illégales est assuré  Un atelier d’actualisation et validation du document sur les taxes et barrières illégales est organisé 3. La FOPAC SK renforce la visibilité au niveau de la province Un feuillet trimestriel et des émissions radio télévisées sont produits  La FOPAC SK participe aux journées internationales affectées à l’agriculture  Les objets de visibilités (T-shirts, Képi, gilets et autres) sont produits IV. MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PLAN D’ACTION 2012 - 2013 3.1. Les moyens 3.1.1. Les moyens matériels Pour réaliser l’action 2012-2013, la FOPAC- SK dispose du mobilier et des matériels de bureau 3.1.2. Les moyens humains La FOPAC-SK a un personnel de 5 agents dont un Secrétaire Exécutif, Un Chargé de programme, un chargé de plaidoyer, un comptable, un secrétaire-caissière et réceptionniste-ménagiste. Les membres des organes de la FOPAC SK ainsi que les OP membres sont assez mobilisés à participer à toutes les étapes du plan d’action. 3.2. Les modalités d’exécution 3.2.1. Acteurs internes  En Assemblée générale ordinaire et extraordinaire, la FOPAC SK statuera sur les activités, le budget en rapport avec l’échéance du plan d’action 2012-2013.  Le conseil d’administration et le conseil de contrôle joueront leurs rôles définis dans les statuts.  Le plan d’action sera géré par le Secrétariat Exécutif suivant les statuts de la FOPAC SK. Un job description est repris dans le cahier de charges de chacun poste. 3.2.2. Acteurs extérieurs Le plan d’action 2012-2013 connaîtra une participation des acteurs externes suivants :  L’audit de la gestion sera assuré par une maison internationale accréditée par le bailleur de fonds.  Les consultants pour les études et ateliers de formation  Les visites des partenaires et amis de la FOPAC-SK Increase volume and quality of coffee through an effective compost programme, improved nurseries and improved processing of the coffee.

Acting Now DR Congo

General

Africa is currently facing severe food insecurity, with low agricultural productivity being one of the root causes. Factors such as limited access to quality inputs, inadequate extension services, lack of finance, and post-harvest handling issues contribute to low agricultural productivity. Food insecurity is exacerbated by economic, political and demographic shocks, including the war in Ukraine, which has caused rising food and energy prices and lower yields in 2022. Climate change further intensifies food insecurity, with extreme weather events such as droughts and floods impacting crop and livestock production and access to markets. Conflict and insecurity are also major drivers of acute food security issues, leading to population displacement and disrupted livelihoods, depriving people of income sources. Action is needed to relieve acute food insecurity, whilst at the same time structurally transforming food systems. Farmers’ Organisations and its member farmers play a critical role in obtaining this, as they contribute not only to food production, but also to sustained economic growth and climate change mitigation. The Acting Now for Food Security and Resilient Food Systems programme, with funding from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (specifically IGG), builds upon its existing strategic partnership with DDE by reinforcing and expanding its efforts on food security, contributing to a more measurable impact on SGD 2 (Zero Hunger). It contributes to improved food and nutrition security (FNS) at the individual farmer level and fosters systemic change in the food system through a total of 82 Farmer Organisations in Burkina Faso, DR Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya and Rwanda. As per Agriterra’s core business, Acting Now will work with and through Farmers’ Organisations and cooperatives to build resilient food systems and to make a sustainable change in the lives of smallholder farmers and their communities. Key Activities Acting Now aims to boost productivity, improving incomes and sustainable land management practices through the following key activities: - Trainings and peer-to-peer activities on FNS related topics, such as Good Agricultural Practices (GAP), Regenerative Agriculture, productivity increase at specific value chains and production of compost and bio-inputs. - Establishment of demo plots to promote and train farmers on new or improved farming practices and technologies. - Offering sustainable services through a tailored approach per country that ensures access to seeds, fertilisers, planting material, agri-inputs and extension services. - Strengthening extension services by co-financing the salary of extension officers and agronomists at the FO through Agriterra’s Jobs Jobs Jobs approach - Co-financing investments and innovations to boost agricultural productivity and food security.

Objectives

Placeholder text

Target Groups

Farmer Organisations and its member farmers

CO-508412

General

Lao PDR is a water rich country, benefitting from the water resources of the Mekong River, tributaries and many smaller water bodies that contribute greatly to national economic development and the livelihoods of local communities. While water demand remains low in terms of per-capita public consumption, in recent years, water resources have gained greater prominence due to the increasing role of hydropower and irrigation in economic development. Largescale construction of dams on the Mekong River and tributaries is expected to impact the hydrological profile and biodiversity of these systems and exacerbate the impact of projected climate change trends related to the flow regimes and by altering processes of erosion and sediment deposition. The total annual water flow in Lao PDR is estimated at 270 billion meters – equivalent to 35% of the average annual flow of the entire Mekong River Basin. Although classified as a low risk (89) on the global Climate Risk Index Lao PDR remains vulnerable primarily to hydrometeorological hazards. Seasonal flooding is common within the eight river basins across the country. Most vulnerable areas are the low-lying flood plains along the Mekong River and its major tributaries in the northern, central and southern regions. The majority of the population resides in rural areas with 72% (in 2015) of the working population employed in the agriculture sector. Poverty is concentrated in remote and rural areas, particularly those inhabited by ethnic communities. Predicted change in climate include increased rain fall of 10-30% andincreased frequency and intensity of extreme weather (floods and droughts). The Mekong and Sekong river basins are prone to regularflooding, exacerbated by deforestation and land degradation due toagricultural practices. Lao PDR has transitioned from a primarily disaster response approach to a risk management approach with the establishment of the National Disaster Prevention and Control Committee (NDPCC) and the National Disaster Management Committee (NDMC) with the National Disaster Management Office acting as the Secretariat. A Department of Disaster Management and Climate Change under the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (MoNRE) wasalso established by decree in 2013. DRM structures at sub-national levels include Provincial Disaster Prevention and Control Committees (PDPCCs) district equivalents (DDPCCs) and at the village level, Village Disaster Prevention Units (VDPU). VDPUs act as the interface between communities and the government system and include representatives of community-based organizations (CBOs), traditional leaders and other community actors. Oxfam has extensive experience in working with these structures including for participatory vulnerability assessments and planning and linking these to the formal DRM structures. Key challenges include resourcing to the DRM structures, coordination between agencies and the need to integrate DRM approaches into development planning given the socio-economic needs in remote areas. Community-participatory DRM approaches are priorities to bridge the gap between formal and informal structures and in recognition of the challenges of service delivery in remote communities. Gender: Despite a policy environment that promotes genderequality (Law on Development and Protection of Women 2004 and Law on Preventing and Combatting Violence against Women and Children 2014) and an overall decrease in the inequality gap between women and men; women are still less likely to attain secondary education compared to men, are less likely to be literate compared to men and due to early marriage are more likely to drop out of school. During disasters women, particularly those from ethnic minorities, are disproportionately impacted partly because theyare more likely to operate in the informal economy, have less access to social protection systems and experience increased exposure to gender-based violence. Traditional beliefs and social norms limit the role women play outside the home and this also extends to DRM structures and practices where the perspectives of women and the role they can play may not be realised unless specific steps are taken. Riverine community vulnerability: Across the country communities in rural areas reliant on agricultural, fisheries and forest resource have heightened vulnerability to recurring hydro-meteorological disasters such as floods, drought, storms, land erosion, earthquakes and pandemics due to the increasing impact of climate change. Vulnerability is not evenwith women, ethnic minorities and remote communities considered more vulnerable. The increasing unpredictability of rain fall and flood patterns that irrigate fields, replenish fisheries and nurture forest and wetlands challenge traditional systems and practices require other forms of information and support to adapt livelihoods reliant on these resources and reduce the impact of extreme weather events. This requires strengthening ofcommunity capacity to understand and assess these changes and impact atthelocal level including the differential impact on women and other social groups; and to collectively plan inclusive strategies to adapt current livelihood practices and strategies while at the same time continuing their day-to-day smart livelihood activities. Local authority capacity: At the local level where policy meets implementation, there are key gaps particularly related to the interface between communities and formal DRM committees at the commune/local authority levels. The integration of investment in DRM and CCA into cyclical local development planning is a key gap despite existing policies that promote community-based approaches. This is largely due to competing priorities at this level and the need for meaningful participatory approachesto be effective that are often beyond the skill set, experience, and time availability/priorities of officials at this level. The integration of community perspectives and analysis into local development planning is also hindered by traditional top-down governmental approaches reflecting power differentials related to resources, roles and social hierarchy including gendered attitudes, norms, and behaviours. Access to data/information: Laos has invested in data gathering and dissemination systems for DRM using a range of hydro-meteorological data sources including rain and river gauges, remote sensing, and weather forecasting technology such as radar and satellite imagery. Delivery systems include pilot warning announcement via mobile messages, installationofloudspeakers at districts and villages, construction of flood protection barrier and warning systems, and various data sharing platforms targeting local DRM committees and riverine communities directly. Understanding what data is available, collected by whom and the social-political factors determining availability, accessibility, useability, and timeliness of data (includinggender, ethnicity, location etc) is of key importance as is incorporation of local and traditional knowledge and experience to inform how the data is used. The Strengthening Climate Resilience (SCR) project seeks to strengthen the resilience of communities living along the Mekong River and tributaries to impacts of climate change. This project builds upon Oxfam and partners’ existing work. SCR will work with riverine communities representing some of the most vulnerable in Luang Prabang and Champasak provinces. Specific communities are also selected based on Oxfam’s understanding of needs, and on existing relationships with projectpartners under the ongoing Inclusion Project Phase II (IP2).