Passar para o conteúdo principal

page search

Community Organizations Other organizations (Projects Database)
Other organizations (Projects Database)
Other organizations (Projects Database)

Location

Working languages
inglês

Other organizations funding or implementing with land governance projects which are included in Land Portal's Projects Database. A detailed list of these organizations will be provided here soon. They range from bilateral or multilateral donor agencies, national or international NGOs,  research organizations etc.

Members:

Resources

Displaying 96 - 100 of 2117

LAND-at-scale: Towards a fair and robust land use management and governance system connecting people for susta

General

The Rwanda Land Tenure Reform programme, launched in 2009, gained international attention by regularizing land tenure at an unparalleled scale. Over eleven million land parcels were demarcated, and eight million land titles were issued to their rightful owners. Despite this, the land tenure system still faces challenges. The land administration and information system (LAIS) does not yet sufficiently address social aspects, such as incorporating informal transactions and safeguards for women, or reducing high costs of participating. Land disputes remain common, and pressure on the courts to resolve these conflicts need to be decreased. These challenges undermine the legitimacy and proper functioning of land governance. This situation is further hampered by the effects of climate change on the country.The objective of this LAND-at-scale project is to improve and ensure sustainability of land registration and management systems and their implementing institutions for enhanced perceived and actual tenure security for the people of Rwanda. This will be done through the following project strategies:1) Institutionalize a (financially) sustainable land administration information and management system.2) Implement sustainable, climate-resilient land use planning at a national level.3) Implement a more just decision-making process by local mediators.4) Strengthen academic capacity to assist in the further development of a fair and just land governance system.Kadaster International is coordinator of the project and is responsible to implement strategies 1, 2 and 4. The International Development Law Organization (IDLO) is responsible for implementing strategy 3.This project is being executed by the Netherlands Enterprise Agency, on behalf of the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

SUSTAINPEAT: Overcoming barriers to sustainable livelihoods and environments in smallholder agricultural syste

General

This proposal aligns closely with 2 of the 5 agriculture and food system challenges identified in this BBSRC global challenges call namely (a) resilience of the food system to climatic variability and (b) agriculture within the context of the wider landscape. This project is designed to support environmental sustainability of important landscapes such as tropical peatlands (and the vital ecosystem services they provide) which is only possible if the socio-economic needs of local communities are combined with local knowledge. Thus, an interdisciplinary approach is a crucial component of delivering successful outcomes; this is embedded within our project. Communities living in the peatlands of SE Asia are especially relevant in this context due to their high rates of poverty and low resilience to environmental stressors (e.g. enSO-driven droughts and floods, air pollution from peat/forest fires) in conjunction with their high exposure to external market forces. The project deliberately considers both Indonesia and Malaysia to allow us to contrast the impact of different within country policies with respect to peatland management. The novelty of the project revolves around a number of interrelated features. Firstly the study will provide a comprehensive account of the status of SHA on tropical peat swamps. It will do so via a dedicated study which will develop and employ an innovative framework tailored to the specific characteristics of SHA on peatlands. Not only will this generate high quality information concerning the current status and challenges facing SHA on peatland, but the framework will provide a transferable approach which can be employed to assess SHA in different areas and is upscalable to national and regional scales. The involvement of smallholders and other stakeholders will ensure rapid translation of research findings into planned proposals for practical action. Thirdly the project employs a holistic approach drawing on, and integrating interdisciplinary knowledge across national boundaries; this integration of the biophysical understanding of the crop and peat systems within a relevant socio-economic framework forms the basis of the research approaches. Importantly, this approach will explicitly develop an understanding of key local and scientific terminology reducing barriers to interdisciplinary research and enhancing prospects for adaptation and innovation uptake. There have been livelihood benefits from previous action-led approaches collaboratively undertaken by research teams and communities. However these have been narrowly discipline based; the breadth and depth of the research disciplines within this project and the peatland environment focus will provide further novelty and opportunities for impact. Fundamentally, our proposal makes an innovative contribution to support Malaysia and Indonesia in achieving their Sustainable Development Goals, specifically in relation to reducing poverty, achieving food security and improved nutrition, promoting sustainable agriculture, reducing land degradation, and reducing (economic) inequality between and within countries.

Objectives

The Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) supports cutting-edge research to address challenges faced by developing countries. The fund addresses the UN sustainable development goals. It aims to maximise the impact of research and innovation to improve lives and opportunity in the developing world. The fund addresses the UN sustainable development goals. It aims to maximise the impact of research and innovation to improve lives and opportunity in the developing world.

Indigenous people’s rights and sustainable livelihoods programme

General

This project forms part of CAFOD’s indigenous people's land and livelihoods programme which aims to support the empowerment of indigenous communities in the Philippines to lead their own development, and improve their quality of life, through increased control and more sustainable management of natural resources within their ancestral lands. The Subanen people who live in the Zamboanga Peninsula, Mindanao, are among the poorest and most marginalized people in the Philippines. Most Subanen communities are located in remote but resource-rich areas, but Subanen people have little, if any, effective representation in decision-making bodies, and indigenous women have even less say. This project will support two indigenous organisations to apply for land rights and develop land use plans for the ancestral lands. Pigsalabukan Gukom de Bayog is a traditional council of the Subanen People of the central region of the Zamboanga Peninsula representing the Bayog Indigenous community. This project will support the community of Bayog to secure their land rights and to undertake a land use planning process in order to reduce resource related conflicts and to ensure the natural resources within the domain will be managed sustainably PDSI is a Subanen women’s network representing the Kumalarang indigenous community. Through this project CAFOD, and will support the community of Kumalarang to secure their land rights and undertake a land use planning process. This process will also ensure that Indigenous women can participate in community decision-making particularly with regard to the management of ancestral lands, maintenance of peace and order, and resolution of conflict.

"Acting for the sustainable use of natural resources"

General

Since the democratic process start in Mozambique in 1990, the governmental action has been guided by the objective of fighting against poverty, which affects in several forms, more than half of the population (54.7%) . Through the adoption and implementation of medium-term strategies (PARPAs I and II, the PARP), and guided by the vision of Agenda 2025 and targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the Government puts into action its Five-Year Programme, with a view to satisfaction of this objective, through promotion of a stable and inclusive economic growth and the creation of a political environment, favourable legislation and institutional development. While the regular and accelerated growth of the economy is ensured by the implementation of a development model based on mega-projects, all over the country, the political environment, legislative and institutional framework that is intended, is guaranteed by an integrated set of measures, which aimed at effective implementation of the democratic rule of law. Studies and reports on the development and evaluation of progress in poverty reduction in Mozambique, indicate significant progress, the level of access to education and health, and extending the institutional apparatus, but reveal at the same time that the poverty has a tendency of stagnation. The persistence of challenges related to governance mechanisms, combined with factors highlighting gender inequalities, regional disparities, the imperfect systems and mechanisms for management and distribution of wealth, illiteracy and limited access to the formal structures of the state, are consensually cited as the main factors that perpetuate the situation, diluting efforts to overcome the problem of poverty. And although the government is guided by a participatory principle, based on creation and institutionalization of spaces for interaction with citizens (Local Councils, Development Observatories) to facilitate their involvement in the affairs of public life and in the process of development in equal circumstances, the poorest, especially in rural areas, where the mega-projects are implemented, remain marginalized and outside the process around it. In Niassa, with ecological, geological and climatic conditions, the implementation of mega projects model-based development, translates into a process of transfer of land from the people to the hand of national and foreign investors, to make way for the promotion of large-scale agriculture (especially monoculture), the establishment of forestry projects that now occupy about 165.772.80 hectare of land and various mineral extraction (gold, garnet, coal, precious stones, industrial minerals, red granite), the costs lows. A watchful eye on the immediate consequences of this action reveals that problems like encroachment of fertile land, resettlement in distant areas, disregard the law and regulations on land, poor functioning of the institutions of law, absence of social responsibility, among others, a result of accreditation and granting of land for those purposes, greatly messes with the livelihoods of communities deteriorate and endanger quality of life of households. That is, the goal of turning Niassa a producer world reference, has focused attention on the volume of investments attracted to the province, transcending and ignoring the spirit of the Constitution and the Land Law of 1997, which take the land as a means of creation wealth and welfare and its use for the benefit and enjoyment of all Mozambicans, in an environment of legality, justice, fairness and transparency. Moreover, although the accelerate growth of the economy of the Niassa Province (in 2006 grew 13% compared to 8% of GDP) is related to the exploration of natural resources and minerals (contributing 29%), the economy of the Province remains predominantly agriculture, which is the main source of employment, which contributes 36% to GDP in the Province, occupying 2.4% of arable land, according to reports the Strategic Plan 2007-2017). The low civic engagement and lack of understanding and awareness of the power and potential on the part of citizens to change the state of things, it appears as the central problem, which inhibits the affected communities to participate in the spaces of negotiation and decision on concessions and to claim respect for their rights and guarantee the enjoyment of real benefits arising from the exploration of natural resources, particularly by women, for reasons that are structural "naturally" excluded processes. The widespread lack of laws, the absence of a culture of oversight of governmental action and poor functioning of institutions, perpetuating the problem, which is also often associated with the inability of civil society (by constraints inherent in their organization, capacity and practice) to explore and capitalize on their credibility and legitimacy to influence desirable, favourable policies and specific agendas of their communities. Different actors (Agencies for Development Cooperation, non-governmental organizations, national and international and government) unfold in initiatives and projects that meet specific objectives linked to promotion of good governance, deepening democracy and strengthening citizenship for the participation of all development. However, many of the interventions appear linked to governmental action, `priority and the proceedings initiated and instituted by the Government, which contributes to the enhancement of the established political power over the construction of active citizenship, considering the problems and needs of specific communities. These interventions are responsible for increasing the level of knowledge and awareness of citizens on the set of their rights, but its exercise remains shy, whichever one relationship from top to bottom, which is not compatible with the effective participation of communities in matters that concern, which makes them unable to discuss and decide favourable conditions and full respect for the right audience that they are enshrined in the relevant legislation relating to consultation, as condition for legitimacy and the transfer of the land concession. As a consequence, the peasant singly or grouped in their structures are not able to secure tenure rights to land and natural resources, a factor of development and social justice. The Province continues as to present a very high index of poverty, when holding a big fountain of natural resource that can also seat the Development.. The districts of Sanga, Lago and Nguama were strategically identified for the implementation of this project, precisely because they constitute potential theatres of conflict over land, thanks to Government expectation (the Prosavana) and the volume of investments made by forestry companies (which occupy 210,000 hectares, according to the PEP) and mass production of monocultures, which need obviously of vast hectares of land. Moreover, there are official records of the predominance of various mineral resources (including gold, garnet, coal, precious stones, industrial minerals, red granite), in all districts including those identified here, especially in Sanga and Lago, as informs the Strategic Plan Niassa (2007-2017). The report of fieldwork, conducted by National Directorate of Land and Forests, under the guidelines of the Prime Minister in September 2010, shows the official recognition of the existence of glaring cases involving companies like Chikweti (Lago and Sanga) Massangulo Society of forests and Niassa (in Nguama) among others, which revealed discrepancies and lack of transparency of procedures for land concessions, disrespect for legacy native forest, irregularities in the transfer of community lands to investors, the disregard for the rules and limits of spatial territorial, usurpation of lands and plantation of fertile lands and conducive to the practice of agriculture, problems of marginalization of communities, among others exiting the dignity of citizens and poorer households, whose subsistence base is agriculture. The project will be implemented in a logical partnership involving three organizations. The Provincial Union of Peasants of Niassa (UPCN), in particular trust will be responsible for sending capabilities to Caritas Lichinga and Diocesan Commission for Justice and Peace (CDJP), so that they, endowed with knowledge, tools and methodologies, can promote together the communities in which they work, information activities and training on all the rights attached to land use and the land and provide the assistance necessary for the proper treatment and resolution of emerging problems in communities. These organizations have representative structures in these districts and established relationships with traditional leaders and district governments, confer some legitimacy to operate and a peaceful environment and establish alliances for coordination of efforts with other existing players. The target group are men and women and community groups whose livelihood is based on agriculture. Special attention will be devoted to population segment constituted by women, mainly, the most vulnerable and marginalized in spaces for learning and decision-making on matters that relate to access and land tenure. The project will be implemented in 6 communities of three districts identified by the implementing partners for reason of its vulnerability. This is a pilot project of the governance strategy aligned CAFOD and their program, still in formulation and, as such, is an opportunity to test the responses to those documents for the proposed set of governance problems identified, contributing to the consolidation of efforts made by the hand of other important actors. Specifically, the project aims to: "To help the citizens and poorer households empowered with knowledge, tools and methodologies to access and ownership of land and the benefits of the exploration of natural resources in their respective areas." The objective will be achieved through the satisfaction of the following results: 1. Communities know and have awareness of the rights of use and enjoyment of land ownership and exploration of natural resources; 2. Organizations of civil society beneficiaries of the project, provide assistance in communities' access and land ownership and exploration of natural resources; 3. Informed citizens use the existing mechanisms and to assert their rights of use and enjoyment of land. These results will be fed by a set of training activities and strategic lines defined as informative and addressed to the organizations and beneficiaries of the project partners and identified community groups.

A Pro-Small –scale Farmer Advocacy Campaign: “Fill My Basic Needs Basket”

General

This project seeks to conduct research on small-scale farmers in view of the changing land use in Kenya and Uganda and advocate for favourable policies to enhance food production and increased access to land for all. The project aims to take stock of the emerging trends in massive land dealings involving government-to-government, government to multinationals and local land grabbing to lease or sell that are mostly not used for agricultural activities making countries susceptible to food insecurity. In Uganda, access to land and land ownership are critical concerns It has three phases; first, research in Kenya and Uganda, second, a national conference in each country to extrapolate policy issues and disseminate the findings, and sensitize more people on the intensity of the problem, and thirdly, advocacy and lobby for policy formulation and change. As a result there will be close working relationship and collaboration with National Catholic Commission on Justice and Peace and Community Resource Network in Uganda, Catholic Justice and Peace Commission in Kenya. Project Objectives: 1. To increase public awareness on farm land grabbing and ownership in Kenya and Uganda; 2. To sensitize the religious institutions, government and nongovernmental organizations and the public in Kenya and Uganda on the latest trends and dynamics on land use and allocation and how it affects small scale farmers 3. To build the capacity of faith-based organisations for policy analysis and advocacy on behalf of small-scale farmers 4. To conduct a systematic campaign to promote pro-small scale farmers