Aller au contenu principal

page search

Community Organizations Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy
Land Use Policy
Journal

Location

Netherlands
Working languages
anglais
Affiliated Organization
Publishing Company

Elsevier is a world-leading provider of information solut

Land Use Policy is an international and interdisciplinary journal concerned with the social, economic, political, legal, physical and planning aspects of urban and rural land use. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information from the diverse range of disciplines and interest groups which must be combined to formulate effective land use policies. The journal examines issues in geography, agriculture, forestry, irrigation, environmental conservation, housing, urban development and transport in both developed and developing countries through major refereed articles and shorter viewpoint pieces.


Land Use Policy aims to provide policy guidance to governments and planners and it is also a valuable teaching resource.


ISSN: 0264-8377


 

Members:

Resources

Displaying 146 - 150 of 279

Push–pull farming system in Kenya: Implications for economic and social welfare

Peer-reviewed publication
Août, 2018
Kenya

This study examines the farm-level economic benefits and aggregate welfare impacts of adopting push–pull technology (PPT)—an innovative, integrated pest and soil-fertility management strategy—with a set of household- and plot-level data collected in western Kenya. The evaluation is based on a combination of econometric and economic surplus analysis. Treatment effect estimates are used to assess the technology-induced shift in the maize supply curve, which is then used as an input to the economic surplus analysis.

EU’s rural development policy at the regional level—Are expenditures for natural capital linked with territorial needs?

Peer-reviewed publication
Août, 2018
Global

The restoration and improvement of natural capital (NC) in rural areas represents one of the main objectives of the EU’s rural development policy (RDP). In addition to creating environmental and biodiversity benefits, NC represents an important territorial asset and a basis to generate socio-economic second-order effects for economic competitiveness and rural viability. However, the regional capability to valorise NC depends on the specific regional context, needs and potentials, as well as targeted policy support.

Myths on local use of natural resources and social equity of land use governance: Reindeer herding in Finland

Peer-reviewed publication
Août, 2018
Finlande

Previous literature on social equity has focused on procedure, distribution and recognition related to land use governance. We propose novel approach to examine social equity by following ideational turn with an aim to explore globally used and locally persistent myths that (mis)inform governance in practice and effect on the three dimensions of social equity for reindeer herding in northern Finland.

A local perspective on drivers and measures to slow deforestation in the Andean-Amazonian foothills of Colombia

Peer-reviewed publication
Août, 2018
Colombie

Colombia’s Andean-Amazonian foothills are among the most pressing deforestation hotspots in the country. Yet, the relationships and dependencies of underlying deforestation drivers are not well understood. For an adequate territorial reorganization in the post-conflict era that is sensitive to local context, a targeted analysis of the present situation at the local level is required. This study investigates direct and indirect deforestation drivers, relationships among these and potential measures to lower deforestation post-conflict.

The local costs of biodiversity offsets: Comparing standards, policy and practice

Peer-reviewed publication
Août, 2018
Madagascar

Biodiversity offsets seek to counterbalance loss of biodiversity due to major developments by generating equivalent biodiversity benefits elsewhere, resulting, at least in theory, in ‘no net loss’ (or even a ‘net positive gain’) in biodiversity. While local costs of major developments themselves receive significant attention, the local costs of associated biodiversity offsets have not.