Cutting 300.2686 ha of land in Ping village of Samki commune in O Chum district of Ratanak Kiri province ELC of CRD company; Donating 265.6379 ha to 79 [77] families; Reserving 34.6307 ha for population growth and physical infrastructure development; and Grating ownership to 110 private land parcels.

Cutting 296.2719 ha in Kak village of Tarlao commune in Andoung Meas district of Ratanak Kiri province from ELC of Hoang Anh Oyadav; Donating 228.9093 ha to 59 families; and Reserving 67.3626 ha as state public land.

Cutting 1,300.21 ha of land in Pu Tit village of Busrar commune in Pech Chreada district of Mondulkiri province: 1,045.31 ha from Mondulkiri Genetic Resources, Plants and Wildlife Conservation Protected Forest, 61.61 ha from ELC of Sethikula, and 193.29 ha from ELC of Varanasi; Reclassifying1,248.22 ha as state private land for donating to 419 families; Reserving 51.99 ha as state public land; and Grating ownership to 611 private land parcels.

Cutting 198.5918 ha in En village of Tarlao commune in Andoung Meas district of Ratanak Kiri province from ELC of Hoang Anh Oyadav; Donating 180.6482 ha to 63 families; and Reserving 17.9436 ha as state public land.

Cutting 996.01 ha of land in Pu Luh village of Busrar commune in Pech Chreada district of Mondulkiri province: 474.83 ha from Phnom Namlea Wildlife Sanctuary, 107.98 ha from Mondulkiri Genetic Resources, Plants and Wildlife Conservation Protected Forest, 5.82 ha from ELC of Sethikula, 379.66 ha from ELC of Dak Lak, and 27.72 ha from ELC of K Peace; Reclassifying 874.10 ha as state private land for donating to 352 families; and Reserving 121.91 ha as state public land.

Cutting 664.02 ha of land in Pu Char village of Busrar commune in Pech Chreada district of Mondulkiri province: 93.28 ha from Mondulkiri Genetic Resources, Plants and Wildlife Conservation Protected Forest, 176.05 ha from ELC of Sethikula, 18.73 ha from ELC of Varanasi, 360.37 ha from ELC of Dak Lak, and 15.59 ha from ELC of K Peace; Reclassifying 628.35 ha as state private land for donating to 283 families; and Reserving 35.67 ha as state public land.

Le Document Cameroun Vision 2035, élaboré en 2009, est composé de trois phases, notamment Phase I: 2010-2019, Phase II: 2010-2007, Phase III: 2028-2035, chaque phase ayant des objectifs spécifiques. Cameroun Vision 2035 a pour objectifs de: (i) réduire la pauvreté à un niveau socialement acceptable; (ii) atteindre le stade de pays à revenus intermédiaires, (iii) devenir un Nouveau Pays Industrialisé et (iv) consolider le processus démocratique et renforcer l’unité nationale.

The present Act is a piece of companion legislation to the Federal Sechelt Indian Band Self-Government Act and provides for provincial recognition of the Sechelt Indian Government District. The ministry is responsible for section 4, which makes the district eligible for municipal benefits. The rest of the Act is the responsibility of the Ministry of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation. The text consists of 8 sections.

The purposes of the present Act are to enable the Sechelt Indian Band to establish and maintain self-government for itself and its members on Sechelt lands and to obtain control over and the administration of the resources and services available to its members. Section 5 establishes that the Sechelt Indian Band is hereby established to replace the Indian Act Sechelt Band.

This Regulation sets out the rules and procedures of the management and administration of natural protected areas and natural heritage sites falling under the authority of the state. The Regulation also covers rules and procedures of appropriation of such areas as well as managing the rules of selling, exchange and renting.

Implements: Decree Law No. 644 on the establishment and functions of the Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning. (2011-06-29)

The six case studies in this book were prepared as background studies for a synthesis report on land administration and reform in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Collectively they cover two main areas of land governance: reforms in redistributing agricultural land; and reforms in land administration. The problems in land ownership inequality and poor land administration are defined and the question of why reforms are necessary is addressed. The first two case studies focus on reforms in redistributing agricultural land in Malawi and South Africa.