This data is characterized by a series of ten indicator questions that point to the security of land tenure for Indigenous Peoples or communities as established in national laws.
- LEGAL STATUS - Does the law recognize all rights that Indigenous Peoples or communities exercise over their lands as lawful forms of ownership?
- LAND RIGHTS AND COMMON PROPERTY - Does the law give indigenous or community land rights the same level of protection as the rights under other tenure systems?
- FORMAL DOCUMENTATION - Does the law require the government to provide Indigenous Peoples or communities with a formal title and map to their land?
- LEGAL PERSON - Does the law recognize the Indigenous Peoples or community as a legal person for the purposes of land ownership?
- LEGAL AUTHORITY - Does the law recognize the Indigenous Peoples or community as the legal authority over the land?
- PERPETUITY - Do the law and formal title recognize that indigenous or community land rights may be held in perpetuity?
- RIGHT TO CONSENT BEFORE LAND ACQUISITION - Does the law require the consent of Indigenous Peoples or communities before government or an outsider may acquire their land?
- RIGHTS TO TREES - Does the law explicitly recognize that indigenous or community land rights include the rights to all trees on the land?
- RIGHTS TO WATER - Does the law explicitly recognize that indigenous or community land rights include the rights to local water sources on the land?
- LAND RIGHTS IN PROTECTED AREAS - Does the law uphold indigenous or community land rights in the ownership and governance of national parks and other protected areas?
The assessment of each indicator is based on a review of relevant national laws, including the constitution, statutes, regulations, and high court cases, to the extent they are available.
Each indicator is assigned a score of 1, 2, 3, 4, Not applicable (N/A), or No data (ND). The scoring of indicators is based exclusively on express legal provisions.
- 1 -> Yes, the law addresses the issue fully. The legal framework clearly or expressly meets the issue addressed in the indicator.
- 2 -> Partial, the law makes significant progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework makes significant progress towards, but does not entirely meet the issue addressed in the indicator.
- 3 -> Partial, the law makes only limited progress towards addressing the issue. The legal framework addresses the indicator, but insignificantly.
- 4 -> No, the law does not address the issue. There are no attempts in the law to meet the issue addressed in the indicator.
- N/A -> The indicator is not applicable. Not applicable is used in cases where the subject matter in question is non-existent.
- ND -> Not enough data to score or not evaluated. No data applies when the country and/or indicator has not been evaluated or there is a lack of sufficient information.
The average score for the ten indicators of the legal security of indigenous and community lands is also provided.
For more information please visit: http://www.landmarkmap.org/data/.
The dataset can be visualised on a free on-line mapping tool produced by the original data provider: http://www.landmarkmap.org/map.